Infraconcrete← Back to home
Geogrid · Design and Build · Turnkey EPC

Geogrid design and build in Malaysia.

Infraconcrete Construction Sdn Bhd delivers turnkey geogrid design and build across Malaysia. Geotechnical engineering responsibility from project geotechnical report to as-built handover, StrataGrid material supply through sole STRATA Geosystems Asia distributor (Starwall Sdn Bhd), CIDB G7 installation, on-site QA per BS 8006 and JKR-SPJ Section 7. Single contract, single accountability for design, supply, installation, and post-construction performance. Design to BS 8006-1, FHWA-NHI-10-024, NCMA SRW Design Manual, Eurocode 7 (BS EN 1997), AASHTO LRFD, with consultant peer review. Project-specific Professional Indemnity insurance. ISO 9001:2015.

EPC
Engineering + Procurement + Construction
BS 8006-1
Primary design code
PI
Project-specific Professional Indemnity
G7
CIDB highest grade
Engineering note For geogrid design and build (turnkey EPC) across Malaysia, your point of contact is the Infraconcrete engineering desk. Send the geotechnical report, functional brief (wall height, design life, allowable deformation, ground conditions), and project location. Same-day acknowledgement, design proposal within 5 to 15 working days depending on complexity. CIDB G7 + sole STRATA distributor + ISO 9001:2015. WhatsApp the engineering desk →
01 / Six applications most suited to design and build

Where this delivery model earns its premium.

MSE wall 4 to 20 m height

StrataGrid PET 50 to 200 kN/m, internal + external + serviceability + connection stability per BS 8006-1 and FHWA-NHI-10-024. Modular block, gabion, or precast panel facing. See MSE wall and MSE wall design with geogrid.

Reinforced soil slope (RSS)

Slope angles 30 to 70 degrees with StrataGrid PET reinforcement layers. Slip-circle factor of safety analysis. Vegetated face or geocell facing. See RSS.

Basal reinforcement over peat or soft clay

StrataGrid or composite at embankment base. Rowe-Soderman 1985 for very soft ground or slip-circle plus tensile per BS 8006 Annex A. Pairs with PVD for accelerated consolidation. See basal reinforcement and PVD.

Segmental retaining wall (SRW)

Modular block facing with StrataGrid PET. Connection capacity per NCMA SRW Design Manual. Heights up to 8 m typical with proven connection systems.

Bridge abutment with reinforced soil

Gabion-faced or modular block facing, StrataGrid 100 to 200 kN/m typical. AASHTO LRFD design alignment with bridge structure. See bridge abutment.

Working platform over weak subgrade

Biaxial PP geogrid plus crushed aggregate platform for crane and tracked-rig operations on soft ground (CBR 1 to 3). Design per AASHTO + Giroud-Han 2004 method.

02 / Design codes and analysis methods

What governs the design.

Code or methodCoverage
BS 8006-1:2010+A1:2016Strengthened/reinforced soils and other fills (MSE wall, RSS, basal reinforcement, embankments on piles)
BS EN 1997 (Eurocode 7)Geotechnical design, partial factor LRFD framework
FHWA-NHI-10-024Design and construction of mechanically stabilised earth walls and reinforced soil slopes
NCMA SRW Design ManualSegmental retaining wall design including geogrid-to-facing connection capacity
AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design SpecificationsBridge abutment with reinforced soil, MSE wall on highway infrastructure
BS EN ISO 13431, ISO 13438, ISO 10722Long-term creep, durability, installation damage reduction factors for reinforcement-grade geogrid
BS EN ISO 10319 / ASTM D6637Wide-width tensile strength
ASTM D6706Pullout in soil for soil-geogrid interaction coefficient Ci
ASTM D6638Junction strength (biaxial and triaxial)
Bishop and Spencer methodsSlip-circle analysis incorporating reinforcement tension
Rowe-Soderman 1985Basal reinforcement on very soft ground (lateral spread analysis)
Giroud-Han 2004Unpaved road base reinforcement methodology
JKR-SPJ Section 7Federal road and rail works specification alignment
03 / Design submission package

What lands on the consultant's desk for review.

  1. Design report: assumptions register, geotechnical parameters, design codes applied, factor of safety check results, reduction factor framework with manufacturer datasheet cross-reference, sensitivity check on key variables.
  2. Calculation backup: software output (MSEW, Wall Calc, Slope/W, ReSlope, Plaxis, or equivalent) with input data and result extraction. Hand-check verification on critical load cases.
  3. Drawings: plan, sections, details, reinforcement schedule with layer positions, lengths, tensile grades, and orientation.
  4. Material schedule: SKU-by-SKU material quantity (StrataGrid grades per layer), manufacturer spec sheet reference, design strength T_d after reduction factors.
  5. Construction sequence and method statement: lift-by-lift fill placement, compaction control, reinforcement placement, facing erection (for MSE wall), settlement monitoring.
  6. QA programme: roll receipt, batch sampling, layer audit, pullout test programme per ASTM D6706 on production samples, connection capacity verification (for SRW).
  7. Monitoring proposal (where required): inclinometer behind wall face, vibrating-wire strain gauge on geogrid layer, settlement plate, optical survey monuments on wall face.
  8. Risk register: identified design and construction risks with mitigation and residual risk owner allocation.
04 / Risk allocation and insurance

Who carries what.

Risk typeTypical owner
Material defect (mill manufacturing fault)Contractor (passes to manufacturer via Starwall route)
Installation defect (workmanship)Contractor
Design error (calculation or specification fault)Contractor (covered by Professional Indemnity insurance)
Ground condition variation from baselineTypically shared per contract risk register, with rate provisions for additional treatment
Programme delay due to weatherTypically shared with extension-of-time provisions
Programme delay due to client-direction changeBuyer
Post-construction face deformation within design toleranceNo claim (within design)
Post-construction performance shortfall within design lifeContractor within warranty period (typical 24 months defects liability, longer for specific applications)

Standard insurance package: Professional Indemnity (PI) for design negligence exposure, Contractor's All Risk (CAR), workmen's compensation, public liability.

05 / Two fee structures

Lump sum or design fee plus measured.

Lump sum (LSTK)

Single project price covering design + supply + installation + QA + handover. Most common for residential and commercial projects with well-defined scope. Buyer pays a known price; contractor manages variability within the contract risk envelope.

Design fee + measured construction

Design fee paid as fixed lump sum or percentage of construction value (typical 3 to 8 percent). Construction priced by measured quantity at agreed unit rates. Most common for federal works where scope is subject to variation. Buyer pays for design certainty, construction quantity flexes against site conditions.

06 / When design and build is the right route

Three checks that signal yes.

  1. The geogrid is structurally critical. If the geogrid is just a road-base separator under low-volume traffic, design and build is overkill. If the geogrid is structural (MSE wall reinforcement, RSS, basal mat over soft ground, bridge abutment), single-point design responsibility prevents design-installation interface issues that can become expensive failures.
  2. The buyer wants single accountability. Property developers, residential builders, and private clients without an in-house geotechnical engineering team benefit most from design and build. Buyer states functional requirement, contractor delivers working system.
  3. The site conditions are challenging. Soft ground, peat, MSE wall on settlement-prone foundation, RSS in complex topography, bridge abutment over weak subgrade. Integrated design-installation thinking outperforms siloed design-bid-build on these conditions.
07 / FAQ

Buyers and consultants usually ask:

How do you handle peer review of your design? +
Peer review is standard. The buyer or appointed project geotechnical consultant reviews the design submission, raises queries, and signs off acceptance. Iteration is built into the design programme. Our design submission includes the full calculation backup so the reviewer can trace assumptions and methodology. Acceptance criteria confirmed at design brief stage.
Can we do design and build on a federal works contract? +
Yes, where the procurement route is design and build (e.g. concession-style highway projects, design-build packages within larger federal contracts). The design submission goes through the project consulting engineer and the contracting authority for acceptance. JKR-SPJ Section 7, BS 8006-1, and FHWA-NHI-10-024 govern the technical content. Project experience with federal corridor scope.
What's the design programme typically? +
For straightforward applications (MSE wall to defined geometry, basal reinforcement on uniform soft ground): design submission within 5 to 10 working days from receipt of geotechnical report and functional brief. For complex applications (MSE wall in complex topography, RSS with multiple tiers, basal reinforcement on peat with PVD): design submission within 15 to 25 working days. Iteration cycle with consultant typically adds 1 to 3 weeks per round.
Do you use independent design software? +
Yes. Industry-standard software: MSEW (Adama Engineering), Wall Calc, ReSlope, Slope/W (GeoSlope), Plaxis (finite element for serviceability check), Bentley GeoStudio family, in-house spreadsheets for specific design checks. Software output forms part of the calculation backup submitted with the design report.
What if our project consultant disagrees with your design? +
Standard route: iterate to resolve. Most disagreements are about parameter values (design tensile after reduction factors, soil-geogrid interaction coefficient Ci) where sensitivity analysis and additional ground investigation typically narrow the gap. Where disagreement persists, the contract typically provides an expert determination route (independent geotechnical expert appointed jointly) or escalation to the project superintendent. For most projects, iteration resolves the gap within 2 to 4 review cycles.
What's the typical post-construction performance check? +
Application-specific. For MSE wall: face deformation monitoring via optical survey monuments, typically for 12 to 24 months post-construction with trigger levels and response actions. For RSS: visual inspection at fixed intervals through the defects liability period. For basal reinforcement: settlement monitoring (settlement plates) through the post-construction consolidation period (3 to 12 months depending on PVD spacing). Triggers and response actions agreed at design submission.
08 / Related capabilities

Design and build pairs with these scopes.

Geogrid design and build brief or tender?

Send the geotechnical report and functional brief. Design proposal within 5 to 15 working days. CIDB G7 + sole STRATA distributor + ISO 9001:2015 + project-specific PI insurance.

Infraconcrete Construction Sdn Bhd
8B, Jalan SS22/25, Damansara Jaya, 47400 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
+60 16-428 1214 · WhatsApp · ifrconcrete@gmail.com · Google Maps
CIDB G7 · ISO 9001:2015 · Sole STRATA Geosystems distributor in Malaysia (through Starwall Sdn Bhd)